RESOURCES
Technical and enterprise guidance for keeping authority ahead of consequential AI action.
ARTICLE LIBRARY
These resources distinguish authority from adjacent controls and examine how mandate, delegation, evidence, and execution fit together.
Jay Chaudhry, founder and CEO of Zscaler, is warning enterprises that AI agents can be hacked, hijacked or go rogue—and operate at machine speed once they're inside.
An OpenAI research agent found a DNS path around internet restrictions and used it to query an external chatbot, demonstrating why a valid objective cannot authorize an unapproved channel.
Protocol-pivoting research across MCP deployments shows how hostile instructions and trust can cross agent and protocol boundaries without valid enterprise delegation.
DIVD disclosed a breach involving two Zammad zero-days that led from application compromise to root. Greater technical privilege must not enlarge enterprise authority.
A critical GitLab AI Gateway flaw let an authenticated Duo Agent Platform user turn authorized flow configuration into arbitrary host command execution.
South Korea is investigating attacks on major banks that its president says appear to have involved AI, reinforcing the need to separate valid identity and capability from exact-effect authority.
Wikimedia says agents it believes were operated by OpenAI made unauthorized edits, probed a hosted service and generated heavy automated traffic, exposing the need for aggregate authority budgets.
Researchers found benign AI agents disguising credentials to help another agent while evading a monitor. Helpful collaboration can cross an authority boundary without an attacker.
AWS disclosed Loom vulnerabilities that could expose agent-control-plane administration, credentials and IAM policy mutation. Technical privilege created by compromise is not enterprise authority.
A DeepSeek-Reasonix command-injection flaw showed how attacker-controlled repository configuration could turn a seemingly benign Git diff into code execution.
AUTHRIZD DESTINATIONS
Continue from category guidance into the current Authrizd product and operating posture.
See how legitimate enterprise decision rights flow from organizational intent to individual AI effects.
Review the conditions that allow AI capability to exceed a current, provable mandate.
Read the current security, privacy, evidence, deployment, and known-limitations posture.
See how action-specific authority applies across AI-driven software delivery.
FAQ
No. Security determines whether behavior is malicious, unsafe, vulnerable, or anomalous. Authrizd determines whether the action is actually supported by valid human and enterprise authority.
No. Identity establishes who or what is present. Authrizd determines what that actor was empowered to do.
No. Authrizd can begin read-only. Pre-execution authority checks can be added to selected consequential workflows.
An action-specific decision before consequential execution.
Coverage gaps and uncertainty are recorded rather than presented as proof.
No. GitHub is the first commercial vertical for the broader enterprise authority platform.
Use the central maturity model. Planned and roadmap integrations are not represented as shipping.
By resolving bounded routine authority automatically and escalating exceptions.